![]() When the gods, angels, and demons of the epic were split from the tradition, the social epic was created, while the sacred epic retained ancient epic religiosity. The second claim, that the epic lost its gods and demons, caused a trifurcation of the epic poem into separate subgenres: the social epic, the sacred epic, and the supernatural epic. Despite his honorable task, Tucker is forced to acknowledge that most critics "depict prose fiction as the genre in which modernity stands forth over epic's dead body" ( 4). Tucker fights an uphill battle to demonstrate that the epic did not die out but flourished from the Romantic to the Edwardian ages. The first claim is typically accepted by critics, although with some exceptions. Second, the "gods, angels, and demons" who engage directly in the action of the story disappeared. First, it was typically no longer written in verse, as the novel became the preferred form with which to tell a long tale. After the Renaissance, the epic lost two of its most fundamental qualities. They also commonly contain "supernatural forces-gods, angels, and demons- interest themselves in the action" (Harmon and Holman 185). Epics have many universal characteristics, such as elevated language in poetic form, vast settings, and strong protagonists who demonstrate feats of great strength and genius. One of the greatest ancient literary genres, the epic, is no exception. As a result, belief, religion, and theology have been central to the main action of stories since the earliest forms of literature. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2016īecause of humanity's fixation on death, religion and the afterlife have played a part in human culture throughout history. Theories of myth are attempts to recreate the meaning of myths once their literal account is " no longer accepted, " 1 and also attempts to identify the source and urgency of specific myths both to the people Züleyha Çetiner-Öktem. Starting with a brief taxonomy of myth theories, their types, and contexts in which they emerged and functioned, I call attention to the fact that any theoretical approach to myth is inescapably mythopoeic. ![]() These include Immanuel Velikovsky's euhemerist reading of world myths as a memory of cosmic catastrophes and near-extinction events witnessed by various human societies in the past Julian Jaynes' proposal about Greek myths-especially those recorded in the Iliad-as narrative accounts of bicameral consciousness that preceded our modern subjective consciousness Sean Kane's comparative perspective on world mythtelling traditions as forms of humanity's dialogue with nature and Jonathan Gottschall's social Darwinist reading of the Iliad and the Odyssey that positions these texts as narrative testimonies of a struggle for Darwinian fitness within an exacting eco-cultural niche. In this chapter I look at four approaches to myth that have not made it into the myth theory canon. One result of this rediscovery of myth has been the proliferation of myth theories. ![]() Both psychology and the fantastic identified myth to be foundational for their fields, either as a record of alternative modes of thought or as a narrative strategy hardwired into human cognitive architecture. The literary fantastic, in turn, was an attempt to explore this dimension and its influence on the human mind. The two processes were not unrelated: psychology came in the wake of discovering that the human mind contains a dimension that is only partially accessible to consciousness. If there is anything that radically set the 20 th century apart from what had gone before, it is the two unprecedented developments: the birth of psychology and the rise of the fantastic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |